<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Page Rank &#8211; Adwords Consultant India : DigitalSRC</title>
	<atom:link href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog/tag/page-rank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://digitalsrc.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 19:12:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.17</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why Content is King – Though You Can’t Build the Empire without Links</title>
		<link>https://digitalsrc.com/blog/why-content-is-king-though-you-cant-build-the-empire-without-links/</link>
					<comments>https://digitalsrc.com/blog/why-content-is-king-though-you-cant-build-the-empire-without-links/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[digitalSRC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page rank update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsrc.com/blog/why-content-is-king-though-you-cant-build-the-empire-without-links/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this blog though I have written on a wide variety of SEO topics including a bunch of link building techniques and tips I have rarely talked about Page Rank. Unlike many others, I have never been obsessed with PR as a SEO and have always treated is more as an indicator of my page’s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog/why-content-is-king-though-you-cant-build-the-empire-without-links/">Why Content is King – Though You Can’t Build the Empire without Links</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog">Adwords Consultant India : DigitalSRC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this blog though I have written on a wide variety of SEO topics including a bunch of link building techniques and tips I have rarely talked about Page Rank. Unlike many others, I have never been obsessed with PR as a SEO and have always treated is more as an indicator of my page’s link strength and nothing more than that. However, this post is triggered by the recent Google Page Rank update that happened yesterday.</p>
<p>Every SEO consultant would vouch for the fact that it is impossible to get good rankings for any competitive keyword till you have developed a solid army of link. So when search rankings are so dependent on links why do we still say Content is King?</p>
<p>Well the fact remains that an able King never has trouble in putting together an army and the case is no different in the world of SEO. Good content automatically generates link ( and if you fret about PR, you will get PR too ).</p>
<p>For one of our company websites we have been working incessantly to improve the search rankings and while we have been building links through various techniques we have always been heavily content centric. </p>
<p>Just 12 days back we launched a viral content. In 12 days , the content  got 277 Facebook Likes, 365 Tweets, 3277 Stumbles and 435 Google Plus Ones and a good number of links too. Result : with the recent PR update, the content page now has a PR of 5 – the highest on the website, even more than the home page.<span id="more-19"></span></p>
<p>So are you still sticking to the old scale link building or would you rather depend on your king ( content) to build his army  of link ?</p>
<p><span>Related Posts :</span><br /><a href="http://seo-kolkata.blogspot.com/2010/01/effective-link-building-in-2010.html">Effective Link Building in 2010</a></p>
<p><a href="http://seo-kolkata.blogspot.com/2007/07/free-back-links-how-to-get-links-for.html">How to build Free back links</a></p>
<p><a href="http://seo-kolkata.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-to-build-back-links-with-google.html">How to build back links with Google</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog/why-content-is-king-though-you-cant-build-the-empire-without-links/">Why Content is King – Though You Can’t Build the Empire without Links</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog">Adwords Consultant India : DigitalSRC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://digitalsrc.com/blog/why-content-is-king-though-you-cant-build-the-empire-without-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Links Must a Page Have Before You Call it Spammy ?</title>
		<link>https://digitalsrc.com/blog/how-many-links-must-a-page-have-before-you-call-it-spammy/</link>
					<comments>https://digitalsrc.com/blog/how-many-links-must-a-page-have-before-you-call-it-spammy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[digitalSRC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page Rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt Cutts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalsrc.com/blog/how-many-links-must-a-page-have-before-you-call-it-spammy/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>How Many Links Must a Page Have Before You Call it Spammy ?How many links should have the same anchor text before Google gives you a whammy ?Yes, and how many links should go to bad neighburhoodsBefore they&#8217;re forever banned? The answer my friend is with GoogleThe answer is here too. Well, I think most [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog/how-many-links-must-a-page-have-before-you-call-it-spammy/">How Many Links Must a Page Have Before You Call it Spammy ?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog">Adwords Consultant India : DigitalSRC</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>How Many Links Must a Page Have Before You Call it Spammy ?<br />How many links should have the same anchor text before Google gives you a whammy ?<br />Yes, and how many links should go to bad neighburhoods<br />Before they&#8217;re forever banned?</p>
<p>The answer my friend is with Google<br />The answer is here too.</p>
<div>Well, I think most of you have realized by now that I am influenced by the legendary Bob Dylan and his  <a href="http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/blowin-wind" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Blowin&#8217; In The Wind</a> ( How many roads must a man walk down ) &#8211; but the content is  inspired by <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/how-many-links-per-page/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Matt Cutts</a>.  Yes, in one of his recent post Matt addressed the question that is often asked by webmasters, SEOs  and link builders &#8211; how many outbound links should you have on one page ?</p>
<p>Under Content and design guidelines provided in Google Webmaster Help, they clearly state a page should have no more than 100 links from it. Matt explained that originally Google bot had the capacity to index only 100 KB of a web page so a page with too many links always had the risk of not getting indexed completely. <span id="more-87"></span>However, Googlebot is much more efficient now and can index lot more than 100 KB &#8211; so this would probably not be a point of concern now.</p>
<p>The main point of concern with having too many links on one page is from the user experience perspective. It has been observed that users typically do not like link heavy pages except for few cases (e.g, web directories ). As Google has always advocated making web pages for users they do stand for the fact that web page should not have too many outbound links.</p>
<p>In addition, for those link builders who hunt for links to boost their PR Matt has also clarified that when a page links to too many website the PR gets distributed among all of them. So even if a high PR page links to too many websites it would be able to pass only a minuscule PR value to each of them.</p>
<p>Google would however not be treating all pages with 100 or more links as spam.  They understand that there might be perfectly justifiable reasons for having a page with more than 100 links. If the links are hidden or keyword stuffed they might however trigger the spam filter.<br />Typically if you have too many links ( more than 100 ) on a page Google would either not follow or not index all of them thereby making them useless.</p>
<p>As I have always suggested to my clients and through my blog posts in many occasion, it is is good to give links to other websites but link out only when you think you can justify it as a regular visitor. Links for the sake of linking or getting link backs are not really worth it, link only when you think that the link is going to benefit your visitors, that way not only are you likely to keep Google happy but probably add value to your visitor&#8217;s surfing experience.
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog/how-many-links-must-a-page-have-before-you-call-it-spammy/">How Many Links Must a Page Have Before You Call it Spammy ?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://digitalsrc.com/blog">Adwords Consultant India : DigitalSRC</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://digitalsrc.com/blog/how-many-links-must-a-page-have-before-you-call-it-spammy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Object Caching 7/75 objects using disk
Page Caching using disk: enhanced 
Minified using disk
Database Caching 9/40 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk

Served from: digitalsrc.com @ 2026-05-17 08:31:47 by W3 Total Cache
-->